i think thats part of the role, a few of them will switch from antagonist to protagonist. every speach will be well planned, the rogan is no exception to that. media2.0 will be the switch from classical tv views to internet views. they needed the podcaster to introduce the cia journalist assets backin. we in for mockingbird 3.0 i feel. maybe i'm a fool, but looking at people sitting comfy telling how everything is a scam while having promoted it and lived rich over it is conterproductive. If we follow the money and genealogy they all pretty shady to me. tucker especialy. Trump too... i only believe in god and no other humans is worth the trust i gave to him.But i do lend a ear to everyone, literaly everyone!
I always trust god, cant say the same about humanity. Even less from the tucker family.
definition of tuck:
“tuck” is a verb that means to push in the loose end of something, such as a piece of clothing or material, into a particular place or position, often to hold it tightly or securely.
thats funny to me because i am french, learned this expression recently...and god does it fits well the whole family =) been tucking stuff under the rug for a loooong long time.
hope i'm not deceiving anyone and if so... just forget what i just said. I dont think anyone wants to know that glimps of hope is sadly nothing. One day everyone will see, who's the fool is irrelevant since its gonna happen anyway. I sincerly wish all the pro trump and such are right, but i have strong signals showing otherwise. After almost a 100 years of cinema, they have long mastered the art of being convincing heh =)
No shame in listening propaganda, there is only shame when we believe it. I always have to watch both side of a coin, so i listened to russel brand altho he is a scam, i read books of opposite views of mine to confront my beliefs. i find value where there is none often. So Tucker show just because he is in the center of the storm with trump and musk, it is indeed usefull to keep an eye on it=) i do too sporadicly.
Thank you for your comment! Have you heard of Whitney Webb? She wrote a book named One Nation Under Blackmail! She also has all the footnotes in it to confirm the information in the book(s) Check it out!
yes i know her and her work very well. She went on a tour on many podcast i got acquainted then and rade some part of the book but its huge work. i'm still on it. thanks for the advice =)
Thanks, Richard. I had considered Tucker to be controlled opposition for the way he eulogized Democracy as something other than a tyranny of the majority. But, as much as ungodly populism, demagoguery and DARPA/psyop alarm me, this interview makes me look at Tucker from a more open perspective - he may not be as influenced by these forces as I believed him to be.
BTW you may find this observation regarding democracy from James Madison's Federalist 10 worthy of consideration: "...that measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice, and the rights of the minor party; but by the superior force of an interested and over-bearing majority."
Looks like I need to search Dick (Richard) Carlson. Do you have any links? On the other hand, I differ profoundly from my own dad. So, I need to keep that in mind.
i think thats part of the role, a few of them will switch from antagonist to protagonist. every speach will be well planned, the rogan is no exception to that. media2.0 will be the switch from classical tv views to internet views. they needed the podcaster to introduce the cia journalist assets backin. we in for mockingbird 3.0 i feel. maybe i'm a fool, but looking at people sitting comfy telling how everything is a scam while having promoted it and lived rich over it is conterproductive. If we follow the money and genealogy they all pretty shady to me. tucker especialy. Trump too... i only believe in god and no other humans is worth the trust i gave to him.But i do lend a ear to everyone, literaly everyone!
I always trust god, cant say the same about humanity. Even less from the tucker family.
definition of tuck:
“tuck” is a verb that means to push in the loose end of something, such as a piece of clothing or material, into a particular place or position, often to hold it tightly or securely.
thats funny to me because i am french, learned this expression recently...and god does it fits well the whole family =) been tucking stuff under the rug for a loooong long time.
hope i'm not deceiving anyone and if so... just forget what i just said. I dont think anyone wants to know that glimps of hope is sadly nothing. One day everyone will see, who's the fool is irrelevant since its gonna happen anyway. I sincerly wish all the pro trump and such are right, but i have strong signals showing otherwise. After almost a 100 years of cinema, they have long mastered the art of being convincing heh =)
D'un CH.I.Q type
So True! Yea, I read about TC’s dad as well. On occasion I will watch SOME of his interviews, but I don’t always take him at face value!
No shame in listening propaganda, there is only shame when we believe it. I always have to watch both side of a coin, so i listened to russel brand altho he is a scam, i read books of opposite views of mine to confront my beliefs. i find value where there is none often. So Tucker show just because he is in the center of the storm with trump and musk, it is indeed usefull to keep an eye on it=) i do too sporadicly.
Thank you for your comment! Have you heard of Whitney Webb? She wrote a book named One Nation Under Blackmail! She also has all the footnotes in it to confirm the information in the book(s) Check it out!
yes i know her and her work very well. She went on a tour on many podcast i got acquainted then and rade some part of the book but its huge work. i'm still on it. thanks for the advice =)
Thanks, Richard. I had considered Tucker to be controlled opposition for the way he eulogized Democracy as something other than a tyranny of the majority. But, as much as ungodly populism, demagoguery and DARPA/psyop alarm me, this interview makes me look at Tucker from a more open perspective - he may not be as influenced by these forces as I believed him to be.
BTW you may find this observation regarding democracy from James Madison's Federalist 10 worthy of consideration: "...that measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice, and the rights of the minor party; but by the superior force of an interested and over-bearing majority."
Looks like I need to search Dick (Richard) Carlson. Do you have any links? On the other hand, I differ profoundly from my own dad. So, I need to keep that in mind.