1. The 9/11 event was a sophisticated, computer controlled demolition. There were teams of technicians installing a new fire alarm system at the same time as teams of demolition crews installed thermite to melt the steel girders that held the buildings together. They wore the same uniforms as the legitimate fire alarm installers. A friend of a friend of mine was one of the fire alarm supervisors. He knew nothing of the demolition mischief. I could see puffs of smoke that squirted from the sides of one of the buildings as its floors collapsed on one another like pancakes while I watched it happen on my idiot box. Many witnesses reported molten steel pouring from the buildings from the melting girders shortly before the collapse began. The steel remained in molten state even the day after the demolition.
2. Both airplanes were guided into the buildings by remote control from the ground. The ability to control large airliners from the ground was reported in “Popular Science” in the 1960’s. One might imagine one suicidal maniac guiding an airplane into a building, but not two.
3. So-called “building #7” was demolished AFTER the towers fell down. It was never even struck by the falling debris. This is additional proof that the entire event was a controlled demolition.
4. One of the buildings had suffered drastic destruction ten years previous to the demolition when a powerful truck bomb was exploded in its parking garage. This ruined the functionality of the building and came within a whisker of toppling the entire building around 9AM when it was full of workers. This would have been far worse than the 9/11 event because it would have murdered everyone in the building plus countless people in adjacent buildings no matter where it fell.
5. The debris was removed from the demolition site with unseemly haste and shipped off to India where it was re-melted without any serious investigation. There was no need for an investigation, after all, because the perpetrators of the demolition knew exactly what had happened.
6. who needs Russians for enemies when our own oily oligarch banksters are maniacs with no respect for human life?
Thanks Lewis. Good information. I also suggest readers get hold of Mark Gaffney's book "Black 911." Very convincing on remote control. Also, there is no real evidence of which I am aware that there were ANY hijackers on the planes. Just that BS passport story.
It never occurred to me to mention that there were no hijackers on the planes. I do have some questions about whether and/or how many innocent people were murdered by being trapped passengers on the airplanes.
It appears there were four planeloads. Two at the Twin Towers, one at the Pentagon, and the one shot down in Pennsylvania. Plus the people in the buildings themselves including the first responders who radioed that the little fires from impact of the planes were a piece of cake. Then boom--the demolition. Again, not one shred of evidence of any hijackers on board. Plus those who died of cancer afterwards from the pollution. Some maintain the demos were done by nukes.
I also forgot to mention that most of the pulmonary damage suffered by the emergency police and firemen and persons in the vicinity was caused by phosgene gas released when the Freon refrigerant loaded in the buildings was released and exposed to the white hot flame of the thermite that melted the steel structure of the buildings.
Thanks for this. Briefly, be ware of limited hangouts that produce evidence. I am not suggesting that the limited hangouts are incorrect or that they should be ignored. I am suggesting that they give many people the comfort of thinking something that is not the whole truth. Kevin is well aware of this. Richard Gage must deal with it. Some of these truths are backstory to establish credible conclusions. One example of this is the true story of the attackers training in Florida. Yes, they did. But, in my opinion, that story was laid out for us to establish their malevolent presence in the country, and their intentions. Flight crews and pilots have debunked the hijacking stories as fiction since the airline protocols would make such hijackings impossible (especially four of them!). Another example is ignoring the significance of the "dancing Israelis" who were caught and released (by Chertoff). Anyway, good on ya, mate. I will forward this to Kevin and Richard. I've been fighting beside them for a long time.
The plan for demolition of the 3 buildings was in motion a long time before 9/11/01. The players were Israelis, Zionists, US govt officials, and more. A few days ago I found an article, written Sept. 2024, that lays out participants involved in the operation. You will recognize many names when you read this article, "Israel did 9/11":
Here is an excerpt: "Ehud Barak [former prime minister of Israel] is connected at every level to the Zionist criminal network responsible for 9/11...Barak was a close associate and business partner of Jeffrey Epstein through his involvement in a company called Carbyne, on the board of which sat Michael Chertoff."
Alex Jones has interviewed Dean Haglund, one of the actors in “the Lone Gunmen” I seem to recall that in the final action scene they are on top of the tower diverting the plane by hacking the remote controls.
A close friend of mine who was in an adjacent building gave me a detailed description of watching one of the airliners fly into the tower with passengers looking out the windows. Don't drink that particular kool-ade.
I am intrigued by that! What building would this have been? I'm working with the max visibility would be about 800 meters or 2624 feet. I used The straight-line distance (“as the crow flies”) from 200 Liberty St (26th floor) to the original World Trade Center complex in 2001 is approximately 2,580 feet.
This calculation is based on the geographic coordinates:
200 Liberty St: 40.71056°N, -74.01556°W
World Trade Center (original, 2001): 40.7070°N, -74.0075°W
The distance was determined using the Haversine formula, which calculates the shortest distance over the earth’s surface between two points given their latitude and longitude. The result is about 2,580 feet.
As you can see, that's pretty near the end that the human eye could see faces in a moving window. This is why I was intrigued as to what building this was seen from.
767 travelling at 583 mph (calculated from the alleged video ~ an impossible speed BTW), with passenger windows 9 inch wide by 12.5 inch high (that's 23 cm wide by 32 cm high) seen at a distance of what? hundred metres or more?
Not sure you would see anything more than a blur?
Remember, the whole thing was a massive PsyOp. Repeated often enough on TV, to traumatised eye witnesses, and false memories can be implanted.
Below is a film putting forward credible "no planes" expert testimony.
I have no stake in any theory. Video of a plane crashing into the Tower 2 is clearly CGI and done badly at that. The 7 foot length of fuselage with several window ports was planted (not there in a photo of the day before). The only piece of engine found was not from a 767 and disappeared to a land fill before any investigation. No other bits of plane found.
I tend towards DEW + controlled demolition with fake planes as a fig leaf.
But what do I know? or for that matter even care at this stage. It happened 23 years, 7 months and 13 days ago. I think we may have more pressing matters to deal with in the here and now?
It was obvious from the start that:
1. The 9/11 event was a sophisticated, computer controlled demolition. There were teams of technicians installing a new fire alarm system at the same time as teams of demolition crews installed thermite to melt the steel girders that held the buildings together. They wore the same uniforms as the legitimate fire alarm installers. A friend of a friend of mine was one of the fire alarm supervisors. He knew nothing of the demolition mischief. I could see puffs of smoke that squirted from the sides of one of the buildings as its floors collapsed on one another like pancakes while I watched it happen on my idiot box. Many witnesses reported molten steel pouring from the buildings from the melting girders shortly before the collapse began. The steel remained in molten state even the day after the demolition.
2. Both airplanes were guided into the buildings by remote control from the ground. The ability to control large airliners from the ground was reported in “Popular Science” in the 1960’s. One might imagine one suicidal maniac guiding an airplane into a building, but not two.
3. So-called “building #7” was demolished AFTER the towers fell down. It was never even struck by the falling debris. This is additional proof that the entire event was a controlled demolition.
4. One of the buildings had suffered drastic destruction ten years previous to the demolition when a powerful truck bomb was exploded in its parking garage. This ruined the functionality of the building and came within a whisker of toppling the entire building around 9AM when it was full of workers. This would have been far worse than the 9/11 event because it would have murdered everyone in the building plus countless people in adjacent buildings no matter where it fell.
5. The debris was removed from the demolition site with unseemly haste and shipped off to India where it was re-melted without any serious investigation. There was no need for an investigation, after all, because the perpetrators of the demolition knew exactly what had happened.
6. who needs Russians for enemies when our own oily oligarch banksters are maniacs with no respect for human life?
Thanks Lewis. Good information. I also suggest readers get hold of Mark Gaffney's book "Black 911." Very convincing on remote control. Also, there is no real evidence of which I am aware that there were ANY hijackers on the planes. Just that BS passport story.
It never occurred to me to mention that there were no hijackers on the planes. I do have some questions about whether and/or how many innocent people were murdered by being trapped passengers on the airplanes.
It appears there were four planeloads. Two at the Twin Towers, one at the Pentagon, and the one shot down in Pennsylvania. Plus the people in the buildings themselves including the first responders who radioed that the little fires from impact of the planes were a piece of cake. Then boom--the demolition. Again, not one shred of evidence of any hijackers on board. Plus those who died of cancer afterwards from the pollution. Some maintain the demos were done by nukes.
The Pentagon appeared to have been struck by a weaponized drone flown by remote control rather than a passenger airplane.
I also forgot to mention that most of the pulmonary damage suffered by the emergency police and firemen and persons in the vicinity was caused by phosgene gas released when the Freon refrigerant loaded in the buildings was released and exposed to the white hot flame of the thermite that melted the steel structure of the buildings.
Thanks for this. Briefly, be ware of limited hangouts that produce evidence. I am not suggesting that the limited hangouts are incorrect or that they should be ignored. I am suggesting that they give many people the comfort of thinking something that is not the whole truth. Kevin is well aware of this. Richard Gage must deal with it. Some of these truths are backstory to establish credible conclusions. One example of this is the true story of the attackers training in Florida. Yes, they did. But, in my opinion, that story was laid out for us to establish their malevolent presence in the country, and their intentions. Flight crews and pilots have debunked the hijacking stories as fiction since the airline protocols would make such hijackings impossible (especially four of them!). Another example is ignoring the significance of the "dancing Israelis" who were caught and released (by Chertoff). Anyway, good on ya, mate. I will forward this to Kevin and Richard. I've been fighting beside them for a long time.
Hooray! for my good senator: "If not yet a 9/11 Truther, Sen. Johnson is increasingly a 9/11 Doubter."
Sen. Ron Johnson is also a Covid vaccine effects Truther.
He is a brave man who does not just warm a seat in the US Senate.
Thank you very much for your fine article, Richard.
The plan for demolition of the 3 buildings was in motion a long time before 9/11/01. The players were Israelis, Zionists, US govt officials, and more. A few days ago I found an article, written Sept. 2024, that lays out participants involved in the operation. You will recognize many names when you read this article, "Israel did 9/11":
https://www.unz.com/article/israel-did-9-11/
Here is an excerpt: "Ehud Barak [former prime minister of Israel] is connected at every level to the Zionist criminal network responsible for 9/11...Barak was a close associate and business partner of Jeffrey Epstein through his involvement in a company called Carbyne, on the board of which sat Michael Chertoff."
No doubt at all that Israel did it. With US government help of course.
Hurry before the copyright AI gets it ! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FcZ6HXIOmYE&list=PL5WtURIBsOzg0-l6Zn8BxWeQjnCjYXx5F
Alex Jones has interviewed Dean Haglund, one of the actors in “the Lone Gunmen” I seem to recall that in the final action scene they are on top of the tower diverting the plane by hacking the remote controls.
What planes?
A close friend of mine who was in an adjacent building gave me a detailed description of watching one of the airliners fly into the tower with passengers looking out the windows. Don't drink that particular kool-ade.
I am intrigued by that! What building would this have been? I'm working with the max visibility would be about 800 meters or 2624 feet. I used The straight-line distance (“as the crow flies”) from 200 Liberty St (26th floor) to the original World Trade Center complex in 2001 is approximately 2,580 feet.
This calculation is based on the geographic coordinates:
200 Liberty St: 40.71056°N, -74.01556°W
World Trade Center (original, 2001): 40.7070°N, -74.0075°W
The distance was determined using the Haversine formula, which calculates the shortest distance over the earth’s surface between two points given their latitude and longitude. The result is about 2,580 feet.
As you can see, that's pretty near the end that the human eye could see faces in a moving window. This is why I was intrigued as to what building this was seen from.
767 travelling at 583 mph (calculated from the alleged video ~ an impossible speed BTW), with passenger windows 9 inch wide by 12.5 inch high (that's 23 cm wide by 32 cm high) seen at a distance of what? hundred metres or more?
Not sure you would see anything more than a blur?
Remember, the whole thing was a massive PsyOp. Repeated often enough on TV, to traumatised eye witnesses, and false memories can be implanted.
Below is a film putting forward credible "no planes" expert testimony.
https://odysee.com/@911Revisited:c/911-A-Plane-Story-uncensored---Rumble-DL:7
I have no stake in any theory. Video of a plane crashing into the Tower 2 is clearly CGI and done badly at that. The 7 foot length of fuselage with several window ports was planted (not there in a photo of the day before). The only piece of engine found was not from a 767 and disappeared to a land fill before any investigation. No other bits of plane found.
I tend towards DEW + controlled demolition with fake planes as a fig leaf.
But what do I know? or for that matter even care at this stage. It happened 23 years, 7 months and 13 days ago. I think we may have more pressing matters to deal with in the here and now?
All good points.