Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lewis Coleman's avatar

It was obvious from the start that:

1. The 9/11 event was a sophisticated, computer controlled demolition. There were teams of technicians installing a new fire alarm system at the same time as teams of demolition crews installed thermite to melt the steel girders that held the buildings together. They wore the same uniforms as the legitimate fire alarm installers. A friend of a friend of mine was one of the fire alarm supervisors. He knew nothing of the demolition mischief. I could see puffs of smoke that squirted from the sides of one of the buildings as its floors collapsed on one another like pancakes while I watched it happen on my idiot box. Many witnesses reported molten steel pouring from the buildings from the melting girders shortly before the collapse began. The steel remained in molten state even the day after the demolition.

2. Both airplanes were guided into the buildings by remote control from the ground. The ability to control large airliners from the ground was reported in “Popular Science” in the 1960’s. One might imagine one suicidal maniac guiding an airplane into a building, but not two.

3. So-called “building #7” was demolished AFTER the towers fell down. It was never even struck by the falling debris. This is additional proof that the entire event was a controlled demolition.

4. One of the buildings had suffered drastic destruction ten years previous to the demolition when a powerful truck bomb was exploded in its parking garage. This ruined the functionality of the building and came within a whisker of toppling the entire building around 9AM when it was full of workers. This would have been far worse than the 9/11 event because it would have murdered everyone in the building plus countless people in adjacent buildings no matter where it fell.

5. The debris was removed from the demolition site with unseemly haste and shipped off to India where it was re-melted without any serious investigation. There was no need for an investigation, after all, because the perpetrators of the demolition knew exactly what had happened.

6. who needs Russians for enemies when our own oily oligarch banksters are maniacs with no respect for human life?

Expand full comment
Jim Hogue's avatar

Thanks for this. Briefly, be ware of limited hangouts that produce evidence. I am not suggesting that the limited hangouts are incorrect or that they should be ignored. I am suggesting that they give many people the comfort of thinking something that is not the whole truth. Kevin is well aware of this. Richard Gage must deal with it. Some of these truths are backstory to establish credible conclusions. One example of this is the true story of the attackers training in Florida. Yes, they did. But, in my opinion, that story was laid out for us to establish their malevolent presence in the country, and their intentions. Flight crews and pilots have debunked the hijacking stories as fiction since the airline protocols would make such hijackings impossible (especially four of them!). Another example is ignoring the significance of the "dancing Israelis" who were caught and released (by Chertoff). Anyway, good on ya, mate. I will forward this to Kevin and Richard. I've been fighting beside them for a long time.

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts