In case a minimum income is introduced, what would be the conditions to fulfill to receive this social benefit and how can you avoid disincentivizing people from finding a job and thus create abuse?
What is required is a citizens' dividend which would supplement income, not replace it. This would also give us liquidity to invest in new businesses, local farming, etc. It would be the same amount for every adult citizen (or legal resident). An example is the Alaska Permanent Fund, an annual payment to each resident coming out of the state's resource revenues. Another name for this is a reverse income tax.
Jean, I think there is no greater force for disincentivizing people than poverty and lack of opportunity. A citizen’s dividend could allow a person to get housing and transportation so they could build a productive life. People want to work for that. The monetary reforms Richard described would boost the real economy instead of boosting the speculative economy that has robbed the nation of its strength and vitality. The real economy is made up of small and medium-sized businesses where the vast majority of people live and work. These small community banks and businesses are not listed on the Stock Exchange, only the very large companies who monopolize all the important industries are and they comprise only one tenth of 1% of the businesses. These big companies are always trying to eliminate or subsume smaller businesses and banks, which they have been doing for 200 years, and happens with every financial crisis they engineer. Monetary reform will end this abuse.
As noted, the Western elites’ genocide program is well underway. Monetary reform, not so much.
Perhaps it will be outside influences such as BRICS that lead the way out of our current mess. If karma is ever a factor, those aristocratic monetary elites may somehow get their well deserved reward. Edgar Cayce - uncannily correct about so many things - once declared in trance that Russia would become the hope of the world. How gloriously ironic.
But I don't take the perps word for why they're waging the Omniwar.
"Thus according to Aurelio Peccei, oracle of the 'Late Great Planet Earth' movement, confidant of David Rockefeller and countless others of the globalist aristocratic elite, humanity today is a 'Bad Dragon.'"
They know people are not a 'Bad Dragon' but they know people can and will get rid of them, the rulers, as soon as possible. So its existential for them and hence for them the urgency. But we shouldn't be confused about the reasons. They are the ones creating the emergencies.
Its even more urgent from their point of view if AI doesn't work to keep people subjugated.
AI Agents have, so far, mostly been a dud
Last year, big tech couldn’t stop talking about how AI “agents” would be the next big thing in 2025. It hasn’t quite turned out that way.
Great article and thank you for standing up against the global genocide going on. It is completely unnecessary. The world is not over populated at all. In fact the carrying capacity of the world is far larger than 7B itself. As a point of fact humans occupy only around 6 percent of the land mass of the world. Maybe a bit more now. There is plenty of land for everyone. When you talk about changing the financial system, of course there is merit to what you say. But have you ever considered what this world would look like and just how beautiful it could become, if everyone in the world was granted the right to a free piece of land at birth? That would be the true end of slavery in this world, do you not think? Do you not think that is what God the creator actually intended from the beginning? Surely so. The land belongs to the creator! Not to those who steal it from others and then charge a price for it. When you say the world is controlled by the money elite, this is true, but what did they do first before they even created the money system that we now all live under? They stole the land! Their money system is based upon controlling the land in the first instance. In order to be able to create debt slaves of all at birth who get denied their God given birth right, or what should be the case, of a free piece of land at birth. If you do not have free land, then you are a born slave to the system, and are pretty much destined to perish, particularly in the times we are in now, when humans are apparently no longer needed. But if they had their own land, then they could all live off it peacefully and sustainably, just as God intended from the beginning! No over consumption... What do you think?
In case a minimum income is introduced, what would be the conditions to fulfill to receive this social benefit and how can you avoid disincentivizing people from finding a job and thus create abuse?
Excellent article! Thanks
What is required is a citizens' dividend which would supplement income, not replace it. This would also give us liquidity to invest in new businesses, local farming, etc. It would be the same amount for every adult citizen (or legal resident). An example is the Alaska Permanent Fund, an annual payment to each resident coming out of the state's resource revenues. Another name for this is a reverse income tax.
I agree, excellent article, Richard.
Jean, I think there is no greater force for disincentivizing people than poverty and lack of opportunity. A citizen’s dividend could allow a person to get housing and transportation so they could build a productive life. People want to work for that. The monetary reforms Richard described would boost the real economy instead of boosting the speculative economy that has robbed the nation of its strength and vitality. The real economy is made up of small and medium-sized businesses where the vast majority of people live and work. These small community banks and businesses are not listed on the Stock Exchange, only the very large companies who monopolize all the important industries are and they comprise only one tenth of 1% of the businesses. These big companies are always trying to eliminate or subsume smaller businesses and banks, which they have been doing for 200 years, and happens with every financial crisis they engineer. Monetary reform will end this abuse.
As noted, the Western elites’ genocide program is well underway. Monetary reform, not so much.
Perhaps it will be outside influences such as BRICS that lead the way out of our current mess. If karma is ever a factor, those aristocratic monetary elites may somehow get their well deserved reward. Edgar Cayce - uncannily correct about so many things - once declared in trance that Russia would become the hope of the world. How gloriously ironic.
This is great, a really good roadmap.
But I don't take the perps word for why they're waging the Omniwar.
"Thus according to Aurelio Peccei, oracle of the 'Late Great Planet Earth' movement, confidant of David Rockefeller and countless others of the globalist aristocratic elite, humanity today is a 'Bad Dragon.'"
They know people are not a 'Bad Dragon' but they know people can and will get rid of them, the rulers, as soon as possible. So its existential for them and hence for them the urgency. But we shouldn't be confused about the reasons. They are the ones creating the emergencies.
Its even more urgent from their point of view if AI doesn't work to keep people subjugated.
AI Agents have, so far, mostly been a dud
Last year, big tech couldn’t stop talking about how AI “agents” would be the next big thing in 2025. It hasn’t quite turned out that way.
https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/ai-agents-have-so-far-mostly-been
https://theworldidreamof.substack.com/
Great article and thank you for standing up against the global genocide going on. It is completely unnecessary. The world is not over populated at all. In fact the carrying capacity of the world is far larger than 7B itself. As a point of fact humans occupy only around 6 percent of the land mass of the world. Maybe a bit more now. There is plenty of land for everyone. When you talk about changing the financial system, of course there is merit to what you say. But have you ever considered what this world would look like and just how beautiful it could become, if everyone in the world was granted the right to a free piece of land at birth? That would be the true end of slavery in this world, do you not think? Do you not think that is what God the creator actually intended from the beginning? Surely so. The land belongs to the creator! Not to those who steal it from others and then charge a price for it. When you say the world is controlled by the money elite, this is true, but what did they do first before they even created the money system that we now all live under? They stole the land! Their money system is based upon controlling the land in the first instance. In order to be able to create debt slaves of all at birth who get denied their God given birth right, or what should be the case, of a free piece of land at birth. If you do not have free land, then you are a born slave to the system, and are pretty much destined to perish, particularly in the times we are in now, when humans are apparently no longer needed. But if they had their own land, then they could all live off it peacefully and sustainably, just as God intended from the beginning! No over consumption... What do you think?
Hello